Why Archie Was Denied Royal Prince Title

 Archie Harrison and  Lili Diana should be given a Prince and Princess titles because they are Prince Harry ‘s children. Everything else is performative allyship. Ethnic people as domestic servants is not inclusion. Most people in the Commonwealth look like Meghan Markle and deserve representation at the top by Archie & Lili.

If ethnic people who make up 70% of the population can not occupy the highest level of the British royal family as HRHs then what is the point of the Commonwealth? Ethnic people working as servants is not inclusion.

British Royals were so concerned about Archie’s skin color that they wanted to change the law so he wouldn’t be a Prince. When Harry said this everyone in Britain called him a liar and yet here we are .

People of color are only accepted as domestic servants upholding colonizer views and never as equals or family. Right now Charles does not pay for Archie’s security so what does the title have to do with the expense? The British royal family has a net worth of $88 billion according to Forbes yet they refuse to fund the security of mixed race royals.

You see it’s not about the expense, its about the no ethnic people in executive places palace policy. Prince Charles does not want to acknowledge Archie and Lili because they are mixed race.

  1. Mixed race Archie and LiliDiana Not Given Prince and Princess Title.  Exceptions Were Made for White Grand Kids Charlotte and Louis

The Queen believes black and brown people are only acceptable as domestic servants. She does not view Archie or Lili as family and has never defended them publicly. French newspapers depicted the Queen with her knee on Meghan’s neck.

2. Archie Highest-Ranking Mixed-Race Royal Was Denied Security and Protection. Absolutely no diversity or inclusion in the palace. Archie’s location in Canada was leaked to the tabloids. Given the threats from Nazis how does the palace explain this? Why was his security not a priority given that the threats had not gone down?

The Sovereign grant report shows that Prince Charles paid for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex until end of fiscal quarter.  The Duke and Duchess performed their last engagement in March at the Commonwealth Service. At that point they were still tax funded members of the royal family.

The royal household and the sovereign comply with the provisions of the Equality Act, in print but not in practice. This is reflected in the silence when Archie was labelled a monkey by BBC reporter. Piers Morgan even bragged that he had proof of palace approval for his work harassing pregnant Duchess Meghan.

3. The Press Said Racism Came from Within the Palace

The carnival of experts and the British tabloids have long maintained that the vitriol and racism levelled at mixed race Duchess Meghan race and her mixed-race son Archie came from the British royal family.

4. Racism Against Ethnic Workers

Buckingham Palace has published figures on its levels of ethnic minority staff for the first time as it admitted it “must do more” re diversity. Ethnic minority employees stands at just 8.5% with 10% target for 2022. This comes amid racism allegations. Ethnic people working as domestics is not inclusion. Prince Charles’ personal secretary quit after being called the “n” word regularly.

5.Kate and William have painting with word “negro” in their living room. They hid the nameplate when they met the Obamas.

The figure that the Palace and all organisations should publish when they publish the headcount percentage of non-White staff is the percentage of salary spend that goes to non-White staff. It is these two figures taken together that provide a more revealing picture. Royals love smiling and taking pictures with brown and black people still using them as props yet do not carry over any sentiment to have them work in top positions within their royal household.

6. The palace remained silent when their grandson, nephew was called a monkey. Showing that they are very much a racist family. If William claims to fight against racism in football why didn’t he fight racism in the media for his own nephew?

7. The Invisible Contract is driving racism toward Meghan and Harry and Archie

There is a symbiotic relationship – the “invisible contract” – between the press and the royal family. Prince Williams reached out to them to provide negative coverage of pregnant Meghan showing total disregard for the mixed-race Archie and Meghan.

8. Use of derogatory terms against Sussexs in the palace

The Queen allowed palace aides use derogatory names “hostage” for Harry and “Me-gain” for Meghan. Yes the head of the church of England had little regard for human life. 70% of the Commonwealth look like Meghan and Archie.

9. William and Kate’s uncle supports structural racism. He used “F” word against the Sussexs when they advocated for the end of Structural racism.

10.  Buckingham Palace No Ethnic Faces in Executive Places

The Queen’s courtiers banned “colored immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s. They are exempt for being sued for discrimination. Documents housed in the National Archives contain information which reignited the debate over the British royal family and race in the Commonwealth. The documents also shed light on how Buckingham Palace negotiated controversial clauses – that remain in place to this day – exempting the Queen and her household from laws that prevent race and sex discrimination.

11. Source of British royal wealth – colonialism

The wealth of Britain was built on the back of colonies. Museums are filled with colonial art and diamonds. After all the British royal family has a net worth of $88 billion according to Forbes. Ethnic people are common and the Windsors have all the wealth.

The Queen awards a Commonwealth Medal Order of St Michael and St George which depicts a race identity of a white angel and black devil. The white angel is standing on the neck of a black person depicted as the devil.

12. William exhibits belief in white supremacy. His own father Prince Charles refused to be carried like a colonizer when he visited Tuvalu. William was very comfortable taking the colonizer position.This is the 21st century William must apologize for this colonizer behavior.

Archie the Queen’s great grandson has been deprived of a title and security because of his brown face. This ensures that there is no black or brown face in the royal family. Representation does not matter to Queen Elizabeth, or Prince Charles or William. They view ethnic minorities as only fit for domestic positions in the royal household. What other sign does the Commonwealth need to realize that the Queen believes in ethnic labor and Windsor white wealth. People of color make up 70% of the Commonwealth and they need to hear Archie’s brown face is welcome in the royal family not as a servant but as a Prince.

 

1 thought on “Why Archie Was Denied Royal Prince Title

  1. Ms. Cindy Wu

    I think you’re comments were perfect…thank you.

    Another thing that left me shaking my head is this: H&M are (more or less) the first mixed race, married couple who brought into this world a mixed-race son. I want to know why the Queen didn’t attend baby Archie’s christening? I’m not buying the Queen’s PR answer…the Queen had prior obligations…yeah, right. The Queen’s PR team must think everybody is a fool. Don’t you know that Duchess Meghan coordinated the day of her baby’s christening with the Queen’s schedule? The Queen is really something else. For historical purposes, the Queen should have been at baby Archie’s christening.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *